Project Objective

The client sought to conduct a comprehensive patent landscape analysis within the point-of-sale (PoS) domain. The primary goal was to identify valuable patents for potential licensing negotiations.

Project Methodology

To address the client’s requirements, Adroip Services employed a strategic blend of resources and methodologies:

1. Understanding Call:
   • Engaged in detailed discussions with the client to clarify project requirements and ensure alignment on technology understanding and project scope.
2. Study of Client’s Product Portfolio:
   • Analyzed the client’s product categories and product features to create a taxonomy for classifying the patent portfolio effectively.
3. Search String Preparation:
   • Developed precise search strings based on a deep understanding of the domain to capture relevant patents.
4. Taxonomy Preparation:
   • Designed a three-level taxonomy specifically tailored to the PoS system, emphasizing product types and application areas within the client’s domain.
5. Patent Search:
   • Conducted keyword-based and class-based searches (IPC, ECLA, USPC, CPC) to identify pertinent patents.
6. Screening and Detailed Categorization of Patents:
   • Manually reviewed patents to filter out non-relevant ones.
   • Categorized relevant patents under the appropriate taxonomy levels.
   • Provided detailed comments describing the novelty of each patent.
7. Graphical Analysis:
   • Presented key insights and analysis based on technical categories, filing trends, and assignees.

Outcome

Based on the comprehensive analysis, the client achieved the following outcomes:

• Identified a list of patents irrelevant to their products, which were subsequently excluded from licensing agreement renewals.
• Prioritized highly ranked patents for focused negotiation during licensing discussions.
• Compiled a list of low-ranked patents. By leveraging this information, the client effectively managed their licensing deal, resulting in cost savings and improved decision-making.

Project Objective

Our client sought an in-depth analysis of the patent portfolios held by five competitors operating within the printing technology domain. The primary objective was to identify critical technical areas where further innovation and potential future investments could be strategically directed.

Project Methodology

Adroip Services meticulously followed a systematic approach to address the client’s requirements:

1. Client Consultations:

   • Engaged in detailed discussions with the client to precisely understand their requirements and ensure alignment on project scope and technology nuances.

2. Taxonomy Development:

   • Prepared an exhaustive list of technical categories and sub-categories, which were subsequently confirmed by the client.

3. Patent Search:

   • Conducted comprehensive searches using keywords, patent classes (IPC, ECLA, USPC), and assignee information to identify relevant patents within the printing technology domain.

4. Initial Screening:

   • Identified the most relevant patents (best matches based on client criteria) from the search results (total count of relevant patents approximately 2000).

5. Detailed Categorization and “Problem-Solution” Analysis:

   • Categorized each relevant patent according to the established taxonomy.
   • Analyzed the problem addressed and the proposed solution for each patented invention.

6. Graphical Analysis:

   • Presented key insights and findings based on technical categories, specific problems, and innovative solutions.

Outcome

The comprehensive analysis enabled the client to make informed decisions:

• Unexplored Technology Categories: Areas that had received little or no attention previously.
• Underexplored Problem Areas: Issues that had not been adequately addressed.
• Untapped Solution Areas: Opportunities for novel solutions.
• Emerging Problem-Solution Combinations: Innovative approaches yet to be explored.

These insights were highly valued by the client and played a pivotal role in shaping their future innovation and investment strategies, positioning them ahead in the competitive landscape.

Project Objective

Our client recently received a patent portfolio intended for acquisition. Their primary objective was to strategically shortlist the most relevant and financially viable patents from the entire portfolio. To accomplish this, the client engaged Adroip Services.

Project Methodology

Adroip Services meticulously followed a systematic approach to address the client’s requirements:

1. Client Consultations:

   • Conducted detailed discussions with the client to precisely understand their requirements.
   • Focused on comprehending the technology areas and specific product lines of interest for patent acquisition.

2. Portfolio Review and Prioritization (First Stage Due Diligence):

   • Verified patent family information.
   • Reviewed litigation history.
   • Assessed remaining patent life.
   • Verified priority data and assignment details.
   • Examined maintenance records.

3. Product Relevancy Review:

   • Ranked patents as High/Medium/Low based on their relevance to the client’s product line.

4. In-Depth Review of Selected Patents:

   • Analyzed patents shortlisted in the previous steps.
   • Conducted the following analyses:
     • Evidence of Use (EoU) Analysis: Assessed potential future licensing opportunities.
     • Patent File Wrapper Analysis: Explored the prosecution history of each patent.
     • Prior Art Search/Patent Strength Assessment: Evaluated the strength and uniqueness of each patent.

5. Detailed Reporting:

   • Presented the analysis to the client in user-friendly MS Excel and MS PowerPoint reports.

Outcome

The comprehensive analysis enabled the client to make informed decisions:

• Identifying Expiring Patents: Highlighted patents that are either expired or nearing expiration.
• Maintenance Records: Provided insights into the maintenance status of each patent.
• Relevant Patents: Identified patents directly relevant to the client’s product line.
• High ROI Opportunities: Pinpointed patents with significant potential for return on investment.

These insights guided the client in finalizing their patent acquisition list, ensuring a strategic and well-informed approach.